600 km Later: Data from the Field Brings Revisions.
28th mars 2006
On Wednesday of last week I left Bamako to investigate some of the potential sites and routes we were thinking of using for the Cyber-tigi project. It took 600Km to make the circuit, but it was worth every one of them. It turns out we likely have to reevaluate a couple of our sites and a couple of the routes, and virtually everything south of Faraba. They simply don’t fit our criteria in many ways.
Far from being a negative, this allowed us the opportunity to find a whole slew of potential sites and routes. From what we’ve gleaned so far and how we are reworking the logistics we are coming up with an even better model. We took 1 step backwards by having to reevaluate the sites we originally had in mind, but 3 steps forward when we began investigating what we could do with the other information gleaned from the field. Our design is now stronger for it.
We are now considering a 3-cell approach to the Cyber-tigi pilot. We envision using 3 separate CLICs* to service our different locals in 3 different ways. This would help us better understand the merits of delivering services by each of the 3 methods. Additionally, we are now looking at ways to reduce these CLIC’s connection costs by sharing their connection.
Photo of the proposed Cyber-tigi sites and routes.
The white path indicates the route the moto or bachée could travel along.
Blue: CLICs White: Kiosk sites Brown: villages between
The first component would include the original plan of using a moto-person to go from kiosk hub to kiosk hub and hitting villages along the routes. At least once a week the person would take all the information collected, bring it back to the CLIC, upload/download/print/ect. and return along the same circuit to deliver/upload/download/etc. once again at the kiosks. We found 2 potential sites along the Ouelessebougou route we could service in this fashion called Faraba and Niagadina, along with a handful of villages along the principal routes connecting these sites. This would be the traditional “moto / cyber” component of the model.
The next would be the “bachée”* component. Using bachées we envision reaching 3 other sites (Narena, Karan, Bancoumana) meeting our selection criteria and have them serviced through the Kangaba CLIC. At least once per week the data would be sent from the kiosk sites to Kangaba by bachée. Kangaba handles the uploads/downloads/printing/etc. and then returns the materials through the bachée network back to each respective site. This would create a hub-and-spoke component within the model using the Kangaba CLIC as the service provider and bachées as our delivery mechanism.
Lastly, with the Bougoula CLIC we are considering setting up a kiosk in a densly populated town approximately 25 Km away and have the CLIC itself manage the logistics of sending/receiving information with the kiosk. Because this CLIC could greatly benefit from increasing its revenues, this approach would help us determine if, for our part, setting up kiosks alone would be sufficient enough service by itself to extend the CLIC’s services. With this approach we could observe what methods of delivery are developed by the CLIC, their degree of collaboration with the kiosk site, level of interest in creating a new revenue stream from their kiosk, and weaknesses in the overall model. This would be the hands-off component to the model.
Aside from these 3 approaches we have been working with the idea of sharing the internet connection between the CLICs in Kangaba, Ouelessebougou, and Bougoula. At the moment each could greatly benefit from a way to reduce their monthly subscrition costs, and would benefit even more so in coming months as their overhead expenses will be increasing. By sharing their connection they would be able to considerably reduce their service charges and almost instantly see the benefits on their books. All the CLICs could greatly benefit from this arrangement. The technical issue is whether we can get the signal from Kangaba to Faraba to Ouelessebougou to Bougoula, line-of-sight distances of roughly 29Km, 27Km, and 38Km respectively. Frederick Renet, our radio and Wi-Fi expert is working the case now. We’ll keep you updated as new information arrives.
In conclusion, while we did meet some obstacles with our original logistics we more than compensated by reworking the design and finding alternative solutions. Now we have more options and informaiton to consider before making the final decision. Taking a step back we now recognize some of the elements of the project demand more attention (i.e. delivery logistics) and that although the overall goal of each component remains the same – to bring connectivity solutions to rural areas – the manner we deliver those solutions might take a different form in each case. The past week has helped us identify many of the original design’s strengths, weaknesses, and core metrics.
*CLIC: Community Learning and Information Center. Financed by USAID/Mali and in partnership with the Academy for Economic Development (AED) the CLICs are telecommunications centers placed with local organisations such as radios, health centers, or mayor’s offices to promote the ICT development objectives of the Government of Mali and USAID/Mali.
*Bachée: A van used to transport people and goods. They are the predominant mode of public transportation in rural areas.
Posted in LMI | No Comments »












